Annual Review 2022–23
Contents
- About this Annual Review
- Year at a glance
- Acknowledgement of country
- Board Chair message
- Chief Executive Officer and Chief Ombudsman message
- Organisational overview
- AFCA Independent Review
- Complaints
- Who complained to AFCA?
- Overview of complaints
- Open cases
- Closed cases
- Banking and finance complaints
- Buy now pay later
- Scam complaints
- Financial difficulty complaints
- Small business complaints
- General insurance complaints
- Significant events
- Life insurance complaints
- Superannuation complaints
- Investments and advice complaints
- Cryptocurrency
- Complaints lodged by Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples
- Complaints lodged by consumer advocates and financial counsellors
- Complaints lodged by paid representatives
- Complaints outside AFCA’s Rules
- AFCA’s Systemic Issues function
- AFCA’s Code compliance and monitoring functiong
- Engagement, awareness and accessibility
- Corporate information
- AFCA General Purpose Financial Report
- Glossary
Between 1 July 2022 and 30 June 2023
Complaints lodged by paid representatives
Percentage of complaints resolved at Registration and Referral stage
Top five complaints received by product
Product |
2018–19 ¹ |
2019–20 |
2020–21 |
2021–22 |
2022–23 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Consumer credit insurance |
0 |
80 |
216 |
704 |
1,573 |
Personal loans |
171 |
501 |
721 |
836 |
741 |
Credit cards |
444 |
1,014 |
1,198 |
1,135 |
678 |
Home loans |
123 |
407 |
229 |
326 |
380 |
Home building |
39 |
115 |
74 |
131 |
186 |
Top five complaints received by issue
Issue |
2018–19 ¹ |
2019–20 |
2020–21 |
2021–22 |
2022–23 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Misleading produce/service information |
6 |
281 |
181 |
396 |
824 |
Default listing |
1 |
92 |
1,020 |
943 |
630 |
Insufficient product/service information |
2 |
12 |
44 |
172 |
537 |
Repayment history information |
0 |
69 |
458 |
546 |
446 |
Financial firm failure to respond to request for assistance |
149 |
231 |
193 |
304 |
208 |
Complaints closed
Average time to close a complaint lodged by a paid representative in days ²
Stage at which complaints closed
Stage |
2018–19 ¹ |
2019–20 |
2020–21 |
2021–22 |
2022–23 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
At Registration |
233 |
959 |
1,177 |
1,366 |
1,176 |
At Case Management |
192 |
682 |
644 |
715 |
426 |
At Rules Review |
221 |
430 |
768 |
536 |
748 |
Preliminary Assessment |
44 |
191 |
147 |
148 |
133 |
Decision |
28 |
157 |
113 |
71 |
96 |
Time taken to close complaints
Time |
2018–19 ¹ |
2019–20 |
2020–21 |
2021–22 |
2022–23 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Closed in 0–30 days |
167 |
675 |
753 |
907 |
641 |
Closed in 31–60 days |
288 |
705 |
681 |
998 |
767 |
Closed in 61–180 days |
260 |
850 |
1,293 |
832 |
932 |
Closed in 181–365 days |
3 |
189 |
122 |
99 |
239 |
Closed in in more than 365 days |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
¹ AFCA commenced on 1 November 2018. The 2018–19 financial year covers an 8-month period (from 1 Nov 2018 to 30 Jun 2019). Year-on-year changes between 2018-19 and 2019-20 have been calculated pro rata using monthly averages.
² This excludes complaints that were inactive for an extended period, for example complaints that were paused because the financial firm was insolvent or due to court proceedings, and complaints that were previously closed and re-opened.
Paid representatives and AFCA’s service
We understand many complainants experience stress and, in some cases, financial strain. So our service is free and easy to access without the need for representation.
However, complainants sometimes prefer to have a representative help with their complaint, particularly when they need additional support due to illness, financial strain or disability. A representative can be a family member, friend, lawyer, financial counsellor or someone who offers to represent them for a fee. We call this last group paid representatives.
About paid representatives
A paid representative is any person or business that is paid to represent and assist a complainant. It does not include accountants, lawyers, financial counsellors or other representatives who have professional bodies to monitor their conduct.
Paid representatives can include, but are not limited to:
- Debt management firms – which are firms that assist complainants with issues about consumer credit contracts for a fee, or who charge an amount that is payable in relation to a service. These firms are now regulated and must hold an Australian credit licence and be members of AFCA (ASIC Info 254).
- Insurance claims handling firms – representatives who provide claim handling and settling services about insurance products. These firms must hold an Australian credit licence and be members of AFCA (ASIC Info 253).
- Any other entity that charges a fee to assist a consumer to lodge a complaint at AFCA.
AFCA’s expectations of paid representatives
AFCA’s Engagement Charter summarises what it expects from all users of its service, including AFCA. It shares AFCA’s values and outlines the behaviour it expects from financial firms, complainants, representatives and AFCA employees when resolving disputes.
AFCA expects paid representatives to conduct themselves at a higher standard than non-fee charging representatives. Under the AFCA Engagement Charter, all representatives, including paid representatives, are expected to:
- act in the best interests of the complainant and avoid conflicts of interest
- act fairly and professionally towards AFCA and financial firms
- avoid lodging complaints that are frivolous, vexatious or without merit
- support the reasonable negotiation of complaints, including ensuring complainants attend AFCA telephone conciliation conferences
- provide all relevant documentation that could reasonably be expected on initial lodgment of a complaint, including confirmation that the complainant is aware the complaint has been lodged at AFCA and authorises the representative to act on their behalf
- cooperate with our investigations including facilitating provision and exchange of information and evidence, actively participate in the complaint resolution process and avoid unnecessary delays.
Complaints should first be referred to the financial firm, so they can resolve the dispute without AFCA. Therefore, we also expect paid representatives to only make a complaint with AFCA after unsuccessful resolution in the financial firm’s IDR process. If the paid representative is unable to resolve the issue with the financial firm directly, they can then make a complaint with AFCA.
If our expectations are not met, and the conduct impacts the delivery of fair outcomes, it may be appropriate for AFCA to refuse to consider the complaint further under AFCA Rule C.2.2(g). See more about complaints outside AFCA’s Rules on page 116.
As paid representatives are not required to access our services, the fee/s paid to the representative are not awarded as part of any compensation provided in the outcome of a complaint.
AFCA has published more information about paid representatives on its website. This includes a guide on what information paid representatives should provide to AFCA when lodging complaints: afca.org.au/paid-representatives.
Complaints lodged by paid representatives this financial year grew by 6%, a total of 4,234 complaints. Nearly half of these (46%) were resolved at the Registration and Referral stage. At AFCA’s commencement in 2018–19, paid representatives lodged 1,072 complaints. In 2022–23, AFCA managed just over four times that number of complaints.
The top three product complaints lodged by paid representatives were:
- Consumer credit insurance – a significant increase in complaints, up by 123%, from 704 in 2021–22 to 1,573 in 2022–23.
- Personal loans complaints – despite declining from 836 (11%) in 2021–22, to 741 in 2022–23.
- Credit cards – despite a dramatic drop of 40%, from 1,135 in 2021–22 to 678 in 2022–23.
The most complaints lodged by paid representatives in 2022–23 were about misleading product/service information. They made up 824, or 19%, of the total 4,234 complaints lodged.
Complaints closed at the Registration and Referral stage fell by 14%, from 1,366 in 2021–22 to 1,176 in 2022–23. At the Case Management stage, we saw a sharp 40% decrease from 715 in 2021–22 to 426 in 2022–23.
Complaints closed at the Rules Review stage in 2022–23 rose by 40%, or 748 compared to 536 in 2021–22.